Email is the only channel I check reliably.

I am glad to hear from you about the methods or data behind any of the papers listed under Work, about pangenome and structural variation approaches in livestock generally, or about consortium and collaboration questions.

If you are stuck on something specific — a graph that will not build, genotypes that look wrong, an imputation R² you do not trust — a short description of the data and the step that failed is far more useful to me than a general question, and usually gets a more useful answer back.

I answer most emails within a week; time-sensitive matters get prioritised. If something urgent, say so in the subject line.

None of this is a paid service and I do not charge for it. If something turns into real analysis work — pipeline design, graph assessment, imputation or association work on your data — co-authorship or an acknowledgement is the usual arrangement, and it is worth agreeing what that looks like before we start.